World’s worst music competition

There are lots of wonderful things to write about. Last month I spent six beautiful days in Antibes, off piano; went to Siberia first time in about three years; been to Moscow and seen pink penguins in the Red Square and Malevich at the Tretyakov Gallery; have had a week of my life working with Imogen Cooper in Provence; the new CD has been launched, and despite fears and suspicions it receives wonderful feedback; I tried the most convincing cacio e pepe ever and even has been taught how to cook it.
Meanwhile, the little distorted alternative world keeps running and fruitlessly brewing just around the corner. Nothing ever changes in the world of music competitions. Six years ago lovely Jerome Lowenthal, nose deep into his notebook, was giving me a detailed account of my performance of a certain Beethoven Sonata, which I have never played. This September (or the next one) same (or another) Lowenthal (probably around the same age) is giving the same detailed account to another competitor (just because I am, thankfully, done with competitions). He (or another wise mummy) will gladly mumble it to anyone who is interested to hear. And if you want to know, it is a wonderful account – it says your playing was really special and the mummy voted for you. Or maybe – surprise! – he didn’t, because you wrongly played Études Symphoniques without the posthumous ones (or because you wrongly played it with the posthumous ones). And also – and this he doesn’t mention – he had to vote his own student in.
Why am I suddenly in the mood for this angry moaning? Because I, thankfully, well remember the times when I was playing in several competitions a year and didn’t dare to whisper a word (but very private ones) against one of the loathsome notable jury members. Neither did I realise the criminal stupidity of many competition organisers, and was letting myself being poisoned by the flood of waste regularly poured into my ears at one of those post-factum jury sessions.
There is no worst musician in the world, but there are many best ones. Paradoxically, there is no best music competition in the world, but there are many, many worst ones. A music competition cannot be fair by definition, because it is in conflict with the very nature of art. It still can do more good than harm by being respectful first of all. And the very foundation of a respecting competition codex is that a) the jury is capable of real listening to what is going on on stage (which most of them aren’t) and b) the jury is protected from having any students of theirs participating. This seem to be as simple and essential as hygiene. But the world goes on and Arie Vardi is again voting for his student in the finals of San Marino, as Pavel Gililov recently did in Bonn, and Zakhar Bron did in Shanghai, same as Boris Kuschnir – both there and in Moscow. 

6 thoughts on “World’s worst music competition

  1. I have been tirelessly championing for the strict exclusion of teachers who have their students in the competition. When I have the say in the forming the jury like I did in the year 2006 at the first Bechstein Competition in Germany I made it a rule that was strictly obeyed to. It is stunning that so many organizers believe that their competition looks better if the jury members are the same one who go from one contest to another no matter how corrupt…. Sad indeed…

    Like

  2. Dear Pavel

    I’m responding in my capacity as Secretary General of the World Federation of International Music Competitions (WFIMC) as well as a former WFIMC member competition director. I have spent a number of years witnessing, discussing and debating all aspects of competitions and strongly believe that a great music competition can be a great benefit for young artists, audiences and music lovers alike.
    I’m fascinated and intrigued by your post.
    You make some very grand statements and I would like to put forward the role that the WFIMC plays to put some of your comments in perspective.
    Firstly, the WFIMC represents 120 music competitions across a wide range of disciplines. These member competitions agree to meet the Statutes and Recommendations of the WFIMC which specifically address a number of your concerns and exist to address issues of artistic and operational integrity. Most of the competitions you refer to are not members of the WFIMC and I leave it to them to answer your concerns directly.
    Secondly, the WFIMC has developed voting procedures for managing the reality of teachers (or musicians who have held masterclasses) taking part in juries. The WFIMC’s Annual General Assembly devotes time to debating the latest initiatives and challenges faced by music competitions. I can assure you that jury selection and systems of voting are the most regularly discussed subjects at these international meetings.
    Thirdly, you have (deservedly) enjoyed the benefits of taking part in and winning a WFIMC member competition. As I have witnessed with many WFIMC competitors, I am sure that the experience of taking part in a music competition built for young artists has been helpful to you in negotiating a professional career.
    Lastly, I’d be delighted to talk further! I am not sure of your sources of information so let’s get in touch with those WFIMC identities you mention to hear from themselves.
    Until then, kind regards,

    Benjamin Woodroffe
    Secretary General
    World Federation of International Music Competitions

    Like

  3. Hello Pavel!

    Many thanks for your post, which we noticed just now.

    I hope that it will give you a bit better feeling to know that we – at the Alink-Argerich Foundation – always advise organisers to implement rules that prevent students of jury members to take part in the same competition. We have seen it too many times that the results of competitions are surprising and also disappointing. Especially when students of jury members are allowed to take part (or other relations play a role, such as a participant being a family member of someone who is well-known to the jury) and are admitted to the finals (whether rightly or not), we strongly believe that these situations should always be avoided.

    We will always advocate this. Even when competitions have some rule trying to weigh out the influence of jury members who have students among the contestants, we know that this is not enough. Jury members should not have any students taking part in the same competition. It’s as simple as that. We are fully at your side.

    Also in our catalogue, we have written very clearly about this (2016 edition, pages 78-80), and we hope that more and more competition organisers will listen and follow.

    We are planning an international conference for all the organisers of international piano competitions and this will definitely be one of the topics. We want this to be as beneficial as possible to all involved and I can imagine that some pianists might also want to attend. With pleasure, I will think about offering the stage to a few pianists, representing those thousands of young pianists who are going from one competition to another, to have their saying and to inform the organisers about their personal experiences and feelings.

    Hopefully, together we can make the world a little better and improve some of the situations at music competitions, which – and I fully agree with you – are indeed often quite frustrating.

    Gustav Alink
    (Dir. Alink-Argerich Foundation)
    http://www.alink-argerich.org

    Like

Leave a comment